On social media, the line between credible and non-credible content is often blurred. Posts may circulate widely before any verification is possible—random screenshots, anonymous accounts, or influencer rants are often treated as fact, even when their claims are unsubstantiated. Some content lacks clear sourcing at first but can later be traced back to reliable origins. Similarly, subject matter experts may not hold official credentials or institutional affiliations but produce consistently trustworthy content based on past work. Because of this complexity, we believe a rigid scoring system fails to capture the nuances of credibility in social media. On our platform, source credibility is assessed qualitatively. Instead of assigning points, we examine each trend’s roots—whether it stems from reputable journalists, organizations, or firsthand evidence. This flexible, context-based approach helps us remain accurate without oversimplifying the trustworthiness of fast-moving online narratives.